Archives for August 2024

In the best of all possible worlds, every employee is engaged, productive and compliant with organizational policies. Back here on Planet Earth, most employers must occasionally take disciplinary action against employees.

When this situation arises at your organization, it’s important to bear in mind that you could be on precarious ground. Although you have every right to enforce legally sound employment policies, haphazardly or inconsistently applied discipline can leave you vulnerable to costly lawsuits and hurt your employer brand.

Put it in writing

Proper documentation is among the best ways to help protect yourself and ensure that your disciplinary actions have the desired effect — positive change. You’ve got to put the problem and solution in writing. Here are some best practices to consider:

Define expectations. Many workplace disciplinary issues arise from miscommunications about what employers expect from employees and what employees come to believe they can or should do.

For example, let’s say you have an employee who’s chronically late. Simply telling the person, “Get to work on time,” isn’t ideal. State in the documentation the specific time the employee should be on-site or online and ready to work.

Setting expectations can be trickier for more complex disciplinary issues. In these cases, supervisors may want to meet with human resources staff and others to review the job description of the employee in question and develop clearer instructions on how to proceed.

Describe problems in detail. Vague or confusing descriptions of what prompted disciplinary actions can only exacerbate already contentious situations.

For instance, writing “constantly rude in meetings,” may describe the problem in general but provides no specifics about what’s actually going on. Documentation should include pertinent details about bad behavior such as:

• The date(s) and specific location(s) it occurred,
• The actions that constitute inappropriate behaviors, and
• How those actions violate organizational policy.

Of course, not all disciplinary actions are prompted by bad behavior. Sometimes you need to give guidance to employees who aren’t misbehaving but, rather, falling short of expectations.

In these cases, specificity is also critical. Phrases such as “poor effort” or “lack of productivity” generally aren’t helpful. Instead, express in detail what they’re failing to do and how their shortcomings conflict with their job descriptions and other stated directives.

Give employees a voice. Many employers view disciplinary actions as a one-way street. They inform troubled employees of infractions or shortcomings and mandate corrective measures. Yet doing so tends to create a confrontational and punitive atmosphere that may leave both parties unhappy.

As part of your documentation process, ask troubled employees for their sides of the story. In some cases, how they respond may not materially change the situation in question. However, giving them the opportunity to explain can reveal critical details that may soften your view. It may also reveal needed changes to your policies, procedures, working environment and/or technology.

Create comprehensive action plans. The final section of every employee disciplinary action document should answer the simple question, “What next?” Lay out both the specific actions troubled employees should take and the timeline over which those actions should occur. Set deadlines and be sure supervisors are trained to follow up.

Last, be sure action plans state the consequences of failing to comply. These may include adverse employment actions, such as termination or demotion, so don’t hesitate to consult an attorney to ensure you’re on solid legal footing.

Do your homework

Employees’ misbehavior and lack of productivity can have a serious impact on employers’ financial stability. A well-thought-out documentation process for disciplinary actions can help discourage lawsuits, protect you in court, and convey to staff that you take these matters seriously and have done your homework.

© 2024
TopLine Content Marketing Team

Get ready: The upcoming presidential and congressional elections may significantly alter the tax landscape for businesses in the United States. The reason has to do with a tax law that’s scheduled to expire in about 17 months and how politicians in Washington would like to handle it.

How we got here

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which generally took effect in 2018, made extensive changes to small business taxes. Many of its provisions are set to expire on December 31, 2025.

As we get closer to the law sunsetting, you may be concerned about the future federal tax bill of your business. The impact isn’t clear because the Democrats and Republicans have different views about how to approach the various provisions in the TCJA.

Corporate and pass-through business rates

The TCJA cut the maximum corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. It also lowered rates for individual taxpayers involved in noncorporate pass-through entities, including S corporations and partnerships, as well as from sole proprietorships. The highest rate today is 37%, down from 39.6% before the TCJA became effective.

But while the individual rate cuts expire in 2025, the law made the corporate tax cut “permanent.” (In other words, there’s no scheduled expiration date. However, tax legislation could still raise or lower the corporate tax rate.)

In addition to lowering rates, the TCJA affects tax law in many other ways. For small business owners, one of the most significant changes is the potential expiration of the Section 199A qualified business income (QBI) deduction. This is the write-off for up to 20% of QBI from noncorporate entities.

Another of the expiring TCJA business provisions is the gradual phaseout of first-year bonus depreciation. Under the TCJA,100% bonus depreciation was available for qualified new and used property that was placed in service in calendar year 2022. It was reduced to 80% in 2023, 60% in 2024, 40% in 2025, 20% in 2026 and 0% in 2027.

Potential Outcomes

The outcome of the presidential election in three months, as well as the balance of power in Congress, will determine the TCJA’s future. Here are four potential outcomes:

1. All of the TCJA provisions scheduled to expire will actually expire at the end of 2025.
2. All of the TCJA provisions scheduled to expire will be extended past 2025 (or made permanent).
3. Some TCJA provisions will be allowed to expire, while others will be extended (or made permanent).
4. Some or all of the temporary TCJA provisions will expire — and new laws will be enacted that provide different tax breaks and/or different tax rates.

How your tax bill will be affected in 2026 will partially depend on which one of these outcomes actually happens and whether your tax bill went down or up when the TCJA became effective years ago. That was based on a number of factors including your business income, your filing status, where you live (the SALT limitation negatively affects taxpayers in certain states), and whether you have children or other dependents.

Your tax situation will also be affected by who wins the presidential election and who controls Congress because Democrats and Republicans have competing visions about how to proceed. Keep in mind that tax proposals can become law only if tax legislation passes both houses of Congress and is signed by the President (or there are enough votes in Congress to override a presidential veto).

Look to the future

As the TCJA provisions get closer to expiring, and the election gets settled, it’s important to know what might change and what tax-wise moves you can make if the law does change. We can answer any questions you have and you can count on us to keep you informed about the latest news.

© 2024
TopLine Content Marketing Team

Accurate financial statements are essential to making informed business decisions. So, managers and other stakeholders may express concern when a company restates its financial results. Before jumping to premature conclusions, however, it’s important to dig deeper to evaluate what happened.

Uptick in restatements 

In June 2024, the Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) reported a recent uptick in financial restatements by public companies. The report, “Financial Restatement Trends in the United States: 2013–2022,” delves into a ten-year study by research firm Audit Analytics. It found that the number of restatements in 2022 had increased by 11% from the previous year.

More alarming is a trend toward more “Big R” restatements. Big Rs indicate that the company’s previously filed financial reports were deemed unreliable by the company or its auditors. Although most restatements are due to minor technical issues, the proportion of total restatements that were Big Rs rose to 38% in 2022, up from 25% in 2021. The 2022 figure is also up from 28% in 2013 (the peak year for restatements in the study) — and it’s the third consecutive year that the proportion of Big Rs has increased.

However, the CAQ report states, “It is too early to tell if the increase in restatements toward the end of the sample period is a true inflection point or simply a brief disruption of the previous downward trend.” Overall, financial restatements have decreased from 858 in 2013 to 402 in 2022.

Reasons for restatement 

The Financial Accounting Standards Board defines a restatement as a revision of a previously issued financial statement to correct an error. Whether they’re publicly traded or privately held, businesses may reissue their financial statements for several “mundane” reasons. For instance, management might have misinterpreted the accounting standards, requiring the company’s external accountant to adjust the numbers. Or they simply may have made minor mistakes and need to correct them.

Common reasons for restatements include:

• Recognition errors (for example, when accounting for leases or reporting compensation expense from backdated stock options),
• Income statement and balance sheet misclassifications (for instance, a company may need to shift cash flows between investing, financing and operating on the statement of cash flows),
• Mistakes reporting equity transactions (such as improper accounting for business combinations and convertible securities),
• Valuation errors related to common stock issuances,
• Preferred stock errors, and
• The complex rules related to acquisitions, investments, revenue recognition and tax accounting.  

Often, restatements happen when the company’s financial statements are subjected to a higher level of scrutiny. For example, restatements may occur when a private company converts from compiled financial statements to audited financial statements or decides to file for an initial public offering. They also may be needed when the owner brings in additional internal (or external) accounting expertise, such as a new controller or audit firm.

Material restatements often go hand-in-hand with material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting. In rare cases, a financial restatement also can be a sign of incompetence — or even fraud. Such restatements may signal problems that require corrective actions. However, the CAQ report found that only 3% of all restatements and 7% of Big Rs involved fraud over the 10-year period.

We can help

The restatement process can be time consuming and costly. Regular communication with interested parties — including lenders and shareholders — can help businesses overcome the negative stigma associated with restatements. Management also needs to reassure employees, customers and suppliers that the company is in sound financial shape to ensure their continued support.

Accounting and tax rules are continuously updated and revised. So, your in-house accounting team may need help understanding the evolving accounting and tax rules to minimize the risk of restatements, as well as help them effectively manage the restatement process. We can help you stay atop the latest rules, reinforce your internal controls and issue reports that conform to current Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

© 2024
TopLine Content Marketing Team

Most businesses have websites today. Despite their widespread use, the IRS hasn’t issued formal guidance on when website costs can be deducted.

But there are established rules that generally apply to the deductibility of business expenses and provide business taxpayers launching a website with some guidance about proper treatment. In addition, businesses can turn to IRS guidance on software costs. Here are some answers to questions you may have.

What are the tax differences between hardware and software?

Let’s start with the hardware you may need to operate a website. The costs fall under the standard rules for depreciable equipment. Specifically, for 2024, once these assets are operating, you can deduct 60% of the cost in the first year they’re placed in service. This favorable treatment is allowed under the first-year bonus depreciation break.

Note: The bonus depreciation rate was 100% for property placed in service in 2022 and was reduced to 80% in 2023, 60% in 2024 and it will continue to decrease until it’s fully phased out in 2027 (unless Congress acts to extend or increase it).

Alternatively, you may be able to deduct all or most of these costs in the year the assets are placed in service under the Section 179 first-year depreciation deduction privilege. However, Sec. 179 deductions are subject to several limitations.

For tax years beginning in 2024, the maximum Sec. 179 deduction is $1.22 million, subject to a phaseout rule. Under the rule, the deduction is phased out if more than a specified amount ($3.05 million in 2024) of qualified property is placed in service during the year.

There’s also a taxable income limit. Under it, your Sec. 179 deduction can’t exceed your business taxable income. In other words, Sec. 179 deductions can’t create or increase an overall tax loss. However, any Sec. 179 deduction amount that you can’t immediately deduct is carried forward and can be deducted in later years (to the extent permitted by the applicable limits).

Similar rules apply to purchased off-the-shelf software. However, software license fees are treated differently from purchased software costs for tax purposes. Payments for leased or licensed software used for your website are currently deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses.

Was the software developed internally?

If, instead of being purchased, the website is designed in-house by the taxpayer launching it (or designed by a contractor who isn’t at risk if the software doesn’t perform), bonus depreciation applies to the extent described above. If bonus depreciation doesn’t apply, the taxpayer can either:

1. Deduct the development costs in the year paid or incurred, or
2. Choose one of several alternative amortization periods over which to deduct the costs.

Generally, the only allowable treatment will be to amortize the costs over the five-year period beginning with the midpoint of the tax year in which the expenditures are paid or incurred.

If your website is primarily for advertising, you can currently deduct internal website software development costs as ordinary and necessary business expenses.

What if you pay a third party?

Some companies hire third parties to set up and run their websites. In general, payments to third parties are currently deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses.

What about expenses before business begins?

Start-up expenses can include website development costs. Up to $5,000 of otherwise deductible expenses that are incurred before your business commences can generally be deducted in the year business commences. However, if your start-up expenses exceed $50,000, the $5,000 current deduction limit starts to be chipped away. Above this amount, you must capitalize some, or all, of your start-up expenses and amortize them over 60 months, starting with the month that business commences.

We can help

We can determine the appropriate tax treatment of website costs. Contact us if you want more information.

© 2024
TopLine Content Marketing Team